Polay v. City Council of Peekskill

280 A.D.2d 481, 720 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242

This text of 280 A.D.2d 481 (Polay v. City Council of Peekskill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polay v. City Council of Peekskill, 280 A.D.2d 481, 720 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the City Council of the City of Peekskill, dated August 2, 1999, adopting the determination of a Hearing Officer, dated July 10, 1999, which, after a hearing, confirmed the determination of the Chief of Police of the City of Peekskill, dated September 9, 1998, denying the petitioner’s application for disability benefits pursuant to the agreement between the City of Peekskill and the Peekskill Police Association, and General Municipal Law § 207-a.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination is supported by substantial evidence when examined in accordance with the applicable standards (see, Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
673 N.E.2d 899 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 481, 720 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polay-v-city-council-of-peekskill-nyappdiv-2001.