Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution

184 A.2d 623, 229 Md. 645, 1962 Md. LEXIS 624
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 11, 1962·No. App. No. 28·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from an order recommitting petitioner to Patuxent Institution, after a finding that he was still a defective delinquent, must be denied for the reason that the petitioner filed no specification of errors as required by Maryland Rule 894. Perkerson v. Director, 226 Md. 666, 174 A. 2d 436.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 184 A.2d 623, 229 Md. 645, 1962 Md. LEXIS 624 (Md. 1962).

184 A.2d 623 (Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murel v. Director of the Patuxent Institution
191 A.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)