Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution

184 A.2d 623, 229 Md. 645, 1962 Md. LEXIS 624
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 11, 1962
DocketApp. No. 28
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 184 A.2d 623 (Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polaski v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 184 A.2d 623, 229 Md. 645, 1962 Md. LEXIS 624 (Md. 1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from an order recommitting petitioner to Patuxent Institution, after a finding that he was still a defective delinquent, must be denied for the reason that the petitioner filed no specification of errors as required by Maryland Rule 894. Perkerson v. Director, 226 Md. 666, 174 A. 2d 436.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murel v. Director of the Patuxent Institution
191 A.2d 445 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.2d 623, 229 Md. 645, 1962 Md. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polaski-v-director-of-patuxent-institution-md-1962.