Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 882 F.3d 1056
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 11, 2018·No. 17-1873·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

POLARIS INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant

v.

ARCTIC CAT, INC., Appellee ______________________

2017-1873, 2017-1874 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2015-01788, IPR2015-01789. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

J. DEREK VANDENBURGH, Carlson, Caspers, Vanden- burgh, Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by DENNIS BREMER, ALAN GARY CARLSON.

JOSEPH HERRIGES, JR., Fish & Richardson P.C., Min- neapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOHN CAMERON ADKISSON, ROBERT P. COURTNEY, JOHN A. DRAGSETH, CONRAD GOSEN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 11, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc. (Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.