Polansky v. Sobel
This text of 285 A.D. 1178 (Polansky v. Sobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing proceeding unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The proceeding was properly dismissed as a matter of law. (Civ. Prac. Act., § 1285.) The authority of Matter of Murtagh v. Leibowitz (303 N. Y. 311) is not to the contrary. In that case there had not been, as here, a prior determination, which could be reviewed on appeal. In any event the dismissal of the proceeding was proper in the exercise of discretion. (Matter of Hogan v. Court of General Sessions, 296 N. Y. 1, 8, 9.) Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Schmidt, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 1178, 141 N.Y.S.2d 69, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polansky-v-sobel-nyappdiv-1955.