Polanco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Polanco v. State

771 So. 2d 616, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232, 2000 WL 1726941

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2000·No. No. 4D00-3277·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Augustine D. Polanco appeals the deniál of his motion for postconviction relief, in which he sought jail credit of 167 days associated with a detainer. According to Polanco’s motion, while he was serving a sentence at Moore Haven Correctional Facility, an arrest warrant and detainer issued in connection with the Palm Beach County charges associated with his present sentence. We reverse and remand for further proceedings because the record does not refute Polanco’s claim. See, e.g., Travis v. State, 724 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Price v. State, 598 So.2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

WARNER, C.J., GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Augustine D. Polanco appeals the deniál of his motion for postconviction relief, in which he sought jail credit of 167 days associated with a detainer. According to Polanco’s motion, while he was serving a sentence at Moore Haven Correctional Facility, an arrest warrant and detainer issued in connection with the Palm Beach County charges associated with his present sentence. We reverse and remand for further proceedings because the record does not refute Polanco’s claim. See, e.g., Travis v. State, 724 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Price v. State, 598 So.2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

WARNER, C.J., GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Polanco v. State, 771 So. 2d 616, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15232, 2000 WL 1726941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

771 So. 2d 616 (Polanco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related