Polanco v. Carranza

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #;__ DATE FILED:_4/4/2023 ONANEY POLANCO, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.D., Plaintiff, -against- 1:19-cv-08870-MKV RICHARD CARRANZA, in his Official Capacity as ORDER Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education; NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; and NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The stay in this matter is LIFTED. As Plaintiff’s memorandum of law [see ECF No. 4] pre-dates the Second Circuit’s decision in Ventura de Paulino v. New York City Department of Education, 959 F.3d 519 (2d Cir. 2020), revised briefs with respect to Plaintiff’s Proposed Order to Show Cause Without Emergency Relief [see ECF No. 3], are due on the following schedule: e Plaintiff’s Opening Brief due on or before April 21, 2023; e Defendant’s Opposition Brief due on or before May 5, 2023; e Plaintiff’s Reply Brief due on or before May 12, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to lift the stay in this matter and to terminate docket entry 20.

SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: April 4, 2023 MARY A who! New York, NY United States District Judge