Home/New York Court of Appeals/Polakoff v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Polakoff v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

397 N.E.2d 1182, 48 N.Y.2d 714, 422 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2370
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 397 N.E.2d 1182 (Polakoff v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polakoff v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 397 N.E.2d 1182, 48 N.Y.2d 714, 422 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2370 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the grounds that (a) plaintiff, having stipulated to reduce the verdict, is not aggrieved by that portion of the order of the Appellate Division dated February 15, 1979 which affirmed an order granting a new trial unless plaintiff so stipulated (see Wietecki v Marczan, 38 NY2d 896; Dudley v Perkins, 235 NY 448), and (b) the remaining portions of the February 15, 1979 order of the Appellate Division, and that court’s order dated April 3, 1979 denying reargument or leave to appeal, do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dudley v. . Perkins
139 N.E. 570 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Wietecki v. Marczan
346 N.E.2d 551 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 N.E.2d 1182, 48 N.Y.2d 714, 422 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polakoff-v-harcourt-brace-jovanovich-inc-ny-1979.