Polakoff Bail Bonds v. Orange County

617 So. 2d 378, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4223, 1993 WL 114653
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1993·No. Nos. 92-1814, 92-1815 and 92-2295·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Appellants Polakoff Bail Bonds, as surety for Rose Joseph and American Bankers Insurance, appeal an order refusing to set aside a bond estreature. We affirm.

In this case American Bankers Insurance bonded Joseph for her appearance on two criminal cases. Joseph subsequently pled guilty to some of the charges. The trial court entered a finding of guilt but withheld adjudication pending a presentence investigation and set sentencing for a later date. Joseph was continued on bail but failed to appear for sentencing.

Appellants contend that under section 903.31, Florida Statutes (1991),1 and under the terms of the appearance bonds,2 these [379]*379bonds cannot be construed to guarantee appearance during or after a presentence investigation. Both the First and Second District Courts of Appeal have rejected this argument. See Battles v. State, 595 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); State v. Fisher, 578 So.2d 746 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). We agree with Battles and Fisher and hold that, because there had been no adjudication of guilt, no imposition of sentence, and no final judgment or order entered concerning the disposition of Joseph’s criminal charges, the bonds had not been satisfied and were subject to estreature for Joseph’s failure to appear for sentencing.

As the court did in Battles, we certify, as a matter of great public importance, a similar question to the Florida Supreme Court:

UNDER SECTION 903.31, FLORIDA STATUTES (1991), IS THE CONDITION OF AN APPEARANCE BOND SATISFIED WHEN THE COURT ACCEPTS A PLEA OF GUILTY AND ENTERS A FINDING OF GUILT, BUT WITHHOLDS ADJUDICATION AND JUDGMENT AND CONTINUES THE CASE FOR SENTENCING UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION?

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polakoff Bail Bonds v. Orange County, 617 So. 2d 378, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4223, 1993 WL 114653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

617 So. 2d 378 (Polakoff Bail Bonds v. Orange County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rosenberg Bail Bonds v. Orange County
663 So. 2d 1389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Polakoff Bail Bonds v. Orange County
634 So. 2d 1083 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)