Polackoff v. Sunkin
169 A. 724, 115 N.J. Eq. 134, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 735
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Fielder in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 140
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Polackoff v. Sunkin, 169 A. 724, 115 N.J. Eq. 134, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 735 (N.J. 1934).
169 A. 724 (Polackoff v. Sunkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lorraine Mfg. Co. v. Lorraine Mfg. Co.
101 F. Supp. 967 (D. New Jersey, 1952)
Weiss v. the Stork Gift Shop
45 A.2d 688 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
J.B. Liebman Co., Inc. v. Leibman
38 A.2d 187 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Household Finance Corp. v. General Household Credit Corp.
49 F. Supp. 541 (D. New Jersey, 1943)
R.B. Davis Co. v. Sher
5 A.2d 49 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1938)
D., L. W.R.R. Co. v. Lackawanna, C., Inc.
175 A. 905 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)