Pokorny v. Joy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pokorny v. Joy

69 A.D.2d 884, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11617

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 23, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 884 (Pokorny v. Joy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pokorny v. Joy, 69 A.D.2d 884, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11617 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the City Commissioner of Rent and Housing Maintenance, dated January 6, 1978, as reversed a determination of the district rent director increasing the maximum rent on the basis of certain leases, the city commissioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 28, 1978, which, inter alia, annulled that portion of the determination. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances, the adjustment of the maximum rent to the level directed by Special Term is mandated by section Y51-5.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, which pertinently provides: "g. (1) The city rent agency may from time to time adopt, promulgate, amend or rescind such rules, regulations and orders as it may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this title, including practices relating to recovery of possession; provided that such regulations can be put into effect without general uncertainty, dislocation and hardship inconsistent with the purposes of this title; and provided further that such regulations shall be designed to maintain a system of rent controls at levels which, in the judgment of such agency, are generally fair and equitable and which will provide for an orderly transition from and termination of emergency controls without undue dislocations, inflationary price rises or disruption. Provision shall be made, pursuant to regulations prescribed by such agency, for individual adjustment of maximum rents where: * * * (j) The presence of unique or peculiar circumstances materially affecting the maximum rent has resulted in a maximum rent which is substantially lower than the rents generally prevailing in the same area for substantially similar housing accommodations.” Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the City Commissioner of Rent and Housing Maintenance, dated January 6, 1978, as reversed a determination of the district rent director increasing the maximum rent on the basis of certain leases, the city commissioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 28, 1978, which, inter alia, annulled that portion of the determination. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances, the adjustment of the maximum rent to the level directed by Special Term is mandated by section Y51-5.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, which pertinently provides: "g. (1) The city rent agency may from time to time adopt, promulgate, amend or rescind such rules, regulations and orders as it may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this title, including practices relating to recovery of possession; provided that such regulations can be put into effect without general uncertainty, dislocation and hardship inconsistent with the purposes of this title; and provided further that such regulations shall be designed to maintain a system of rent controls at levels which, in the judgment of such agency, are generally fair and equitable and which will provide for an orderly transition from and termination of emergency controls without undue dislocations, inflationary price rises or disruption. Provision shall be made, pursuant to regulations prescribed by such agency, for individual adjustment of maximum rents where: * * * (j) The presence of unique or peculiar circumstances materially affecting the maximum rent has resulted in a maximum rent which is substantially lower than the rents generally prevailing in the same area for substantially similar housing accommodations.” Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 884, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pokorny-v-joy-nyappdiv-1979.