Poklemba v. Shamokin State General Hospital

388 A.2d 722, 479 Pa. 414, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 772
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 14, 1978·No. No. 118·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Esther Poklemba, both individually and as administratrix of decedent’s estate, brought an action in trespass against appellee Shamokin State General Hospital and others for negligent medical treatment of decedent, her husband. The Commonwealth Court dismissed the complaint against appellee on the ground that appellee, as an agency of the Commonwealth, was protected against suit by the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth.

We have this day abrogated the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978). We therefore reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court and remand for further proceedings.

Order reversed and case remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poklemba v. Shamokin State General Hospital, 388 A.2d 722, 479 Pa. 414, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 772 (Pa. 1978).

388 A.2d 722 (Poklemba v. Shamokin State General Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways
390 A.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)