Poitier v. State
533 So. 2d 901, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2510, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5006, 1988 WL 120874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Poitier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 So. 2d 472 →
Opinion
The prosecutor’s final argument, while improper, see Redish v. State, 525 So.2d 928 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), did not, beyond a reasonable doubt, amount to harmful error. State v. Murray, 443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); Hall v. State, 444 So.2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poitier v. State, 533 So. 2d 901, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2510, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5006, 1988 WL 120874 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
533 So. 2d 901 (Poitier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. State
444 So. 2d 1019 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Redish v. State
525 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
State v. Murray
443 So. 2d 955 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)