Poitier v. Poitier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Poitier v. Poitier

458 So. 2d 428, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16522

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 13, 1984

DocketNos. 83-1394, 83-2622

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 458 So. 2d 428 (Poitier v. Poitier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poitier v. Poitier, 458 So. 2d 428, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16522 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated with respect to the trial court’s rulings concerning lump sum alimony, special equity or costs. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review dismissed, 399 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1981). The court did err, however, by ordering the partition and sale of real property held by the parties as tenants by the entireties in the absence of an appropriate request and compliance with the requirements of Chapter 64, Florida Statutes (1983). Sanders v. Sanders, 351 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). See Muhlrad v. Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). Accordingly, the portion of the judgment ordering the partition and sale of the real property held by the entireties is reversed; in all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated with respect to the trial court’s rulings concerning lump sum alimony, special equity or costs. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review dismissed, 399 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1981). The court did err, however, by ordering the partition and sale of real property held by the parties as tenants by the entireties in the absence of an appropriate request and compliance with the requirements of Chapter 64, Florida Statutes (1983). Sanders v. Sanders, 351 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). See Muhlrad v. Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). Accordingly, the portion of the judgment ordering the partition and sale of the real property held by the entireties is reversed; in all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 So. 2d 428, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2387, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poitier-v-poitier-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack