Poisson v. SSA
This text of Poisson v. SSA (Poisson v. SSA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Poisson v. SSA CV-97-185-B 03/04/98
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Karen A . Poisson for Nicholas D . Poisson
v. C-97-185-B
John J. Callahan, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Nicholas Poisson’s father, Daniel Gagne, was killed in a
motorcycle accident a few weeks after Nicholas was conceived.
Nicholas’s mother, Karen Poisson, attempted to obtain Social
Security survivor benefits for Nicholas. However, the Social
Security Administration denied her claim on September 7 , 1990,
concluding that she had failed to prove that Gagne was Nicholas’s
father. Rather than appealing this decision, Karen Poisson filed
an action in state court seeking to establish Gagne’s paternity.
She succeeded with the state court action and filed a new claim
with the Administration on November 1 0 , 1994. The Administration
approved the new application based on the state court judgment of
paternity, but its regulations limited the retroactive effect of
its ruling to the six-month period preceding the filing of the new petition. Karen Poisson attempted to obtain a fully retroactive award by asking the Administration to reopen the 1990 application. An ALJ held a hearing on her request, but ultimately declined to reopen the 1990 decision. Poisson appeals from the ALJ’s decision.
I must grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss because I lack subject matter jurisdiction. Although Plaintiff claims that the ALJ constructively reopened the 1990 decision and thereby made an appeal possible by holding an evidentiary hearing on her request, this argument has been rejected by the First Circuit Court of Appeals. Torres v . Dep’t. of Health and Human Servs., 845 F.2d 1136 (1st Cir. 1988); Rios v . Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 614 F.2d 2 5 , 26 (1st Cir. 1980). As no other exception to this jurisdictional requirement is present in this case, I grant the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss (document no. 3 ) .
SO ORDERED.
Paul Barbadoro Chief Judge
March 4 , 1998
cc: Matthew B . Cox, Esq. David Broderick, AUSA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Poisson v. SSA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poisson-v-ssa-nhd-1998.