Poisson v. SSA

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire
DecidedMarch 4, 1998
DocketCV-97-185-B
StatusPublished

This text of Poisson v. SSA (Poisson v. SSA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poisson v. SSA, (D.N.H. 1998).

Opinion

Poisson v. SSA CV-97-185-B 03/04/98

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Karen A . Poisson for Nicholas D . Poisson

v. C-97-185-B

John J. Callahan, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Nicholas Poisson’s father, Daniel Gagne, was killed in a

motorcycle accident a few weeks after Nicholas was conceived.

Nicholas’s mother, Karen Poisson, attempted to obtain Social

Security survivor benefits for Nicholas. However, the Social

Security Administration denied her claim on September 7 , 1990,

concluding that she had failed to prove that Gagne was Nicholas’s

father. Rather than appealing this decision, Karen Poisson filed

an action in state court seeking to establish Gagne’s paternity.

She succeeded with the state court action and filed a new claim

with the Administration on November 1 0 , 1994. The Administration

approved the new application based on the state court judgment of

paternity, but its regulations limited the retroactive effect of

its ruling to the six-month period preceding the filing of the new petition. Karen Poisson attempted to obtain a fully retroactive award by asking the Administration to reopen the 1990 application. An ALJ held a hearing on her request, but ultimately declined to reopen the 1990 decision. Poisson appeals from the ALJ’s decision.

I must grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss because I lack subject matter jurisdiction. Although Plaintiff claims that the ALJ constructively reopened the 1990 decision and thereby made an appeal possible by holding an evidentiary hearing on her request, this argument has been rejected by the First Circuit Court of Appeals. Torres v . Dep’t. of Health and Human Servs., 845 F.2d 1136 (1st Cir. 1988); Rios v . Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 614 F.2d 2 5 , 26 (1st Cir. 1980). As no other exception to this jurisdictional requirement is present in this case, I grant the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss (document no. 3 ) .

SO ORDERED.

Paul Barbadoro Chief Judge

March 4 , 1998

cc: Matthew B . Cox, Esq. David Broderick, AUSA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Poisson v. SSA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poisson-v-ssa-nhd-1998.