Poirier v. Poirier as Trustee of Poirier Family Trust

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Poirier v. Poirier as Trustee of Poirier Family Trust

266 So. 3d 272

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2019

DocketCase No. 5D19-394

StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 3d 272 (Poirier v. Poirier as Trustee of Poirier Family Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poirier v. Poirier as Trustee of Poirier Family Trust, 266 So. 3d 272 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Lynn Anne Poirier, petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition to quash the trial court's February 11, 2019 "Order Denying Defendant's Verified Motion to Disqualify Trial Judge." We find that the facts alleged in Petitioner's motion would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial hearing. See MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc. , 565 So.2d 1332, 1335 (Fla. 1990). Furthermore, we find that the trial court's statement that the allegations in the motion were factually baseless went beyond a determination of the legal sufficiency of the motion, contrary to the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(f). See Messianu v. Pigna , 180 So.3d 229, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the February 11, 2019 order denying Petitioner's motion to disqualify, and remand the case with directions that the underlying case be reassigned to a different judge.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION GRANTED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Lynn Anne Poirier, petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition to quash the trial court's February 11, 2019 "Order Denying Defendant's Verified Motion to Disqualify Trial Judge." We find that the facts alleged in Petitioner's motion would place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and impartial hearing. See MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc. , 565 So.2d 1332, 1335 (Fla. 1990). Furthermore, we find that the trial court's statement that the allegations in the motion were factually baseless went beyond a determination of the legal sufficiency of the motion, contrary to the procedure set forth in Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(f). See Messianu v. Pigna , 180 So.3d 229, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the February 11, 2019 order denying Petitioner's motion to disqualify, and remand the case with directions that the underlying case be reassigned to a different judge.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION GRANTED.

EVANDER, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 So. 3d 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poirier-v-poirier-as-trustee-of-poirier-family-trust-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack