Poirier v. Newton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Poirier v. Newton

974 So. 2d 420, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15171, 2007 WL 2811601

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2007·No. No. 2D06-4696·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Ronald Joseph Poirier challenges the trial court’s nonfinal order denying his motion to dissolve Isaac Newton’s notice of lis pendens. Pursuant to Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc., 927 So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 939 So.2d 93 (Fla.2006), we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same without comment.

Denied.

NORTHCUTT, C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, Judge.

Ronald Joseph Poirier challenges the trial court’s nonfinal order denying his motion to dissolve Isaac Newton’s notice of lis pendens. Pursuant to Loidl v. I & E Group, Inc., 927 So.2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 939 So.2d 93 (Fla.2006), we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the same without comment.

Denied.

NORTHCUTT, C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

Poirier v. Newton, 974 So. 2d 420, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15171, 2007 WL 2811601 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

974 So. 2d 420 (Poirier v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related