Pointer v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Pointer v. Division of Employment Security

415 S.W.3d 758, 2013 WL 6498985, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 10, 2013·No. No. WD 76220·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Pointer appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that he was disqualified for receiving unemployment benefits because he was terminated for misconduct associated with his employment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Pointer appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that he was disqualified for receiving unemployment benefits because he was terminated for misconduct associated with his employment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Pointer v. Division of Employment Security, 415 S.W.3d 758, 2013 WL 6498985, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1467 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

415 S.W.3d 758 (Pointer v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.