Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Poindexter v. State

Poindexter v. State

890 So. 2d 513, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3, 2005 WL 17431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 2005·No. No. 2D04-3387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to any right Appellant may have to file a facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief regarding newly discovered evidence. Such a motion shall be filed within sixty days of the date of the mandate in this case and shall not be deemed successive.

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poindexter v. State, 890 So. 2d 513, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3, 2005 WL 17431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

890 So. 2d 513 (Poindexter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.