Poindexter v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
This text of 160 S.E. 923 (Poindexter v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe plaintiff on bis appeal to this Court has failed to overcome tbe presumption against error. Tbe testimony of bis witnesses falls short of tbe desired result on appeal, because of its indefiniteness and uncertainty as to tbe origin of tbe fire.
Tbe burden is on appellant to show error. It is not presumed. Jackson v. Bell, ante, 336; Bailey v. McKay, 198 N. C., 638, 152 S. E., 893.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 833, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poindexter-v-norfolk-southern-railway-co-nc-1931.