Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Poindexter v. Commonwealth

Poindexter v. Commonwealth

798 A.2d 1276, 568 Pa. 598, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1281
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 17, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 143 MAP 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 798 A.2d 1276 (Poindexter v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poindexter v. Commonwealth, 798 A.2d 1276, 568 Pa. 598, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1281 (Pa. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2002, the order of the Commonwealth Court is hereby VACATED. This action in mandamus is REMANDED for consideration of the merits of appellant’s ex post facto claim in accordance with Coady v. Vaughn, 564 Pa. 604, 770 A.2d 287 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coady v. Vaughn
770 A.2d 287 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
798 A.2d 1276, 568 Pa. 598, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poindexter-v-commonwealth-pa-2002.