Pohrer v. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota

882 F. Supp. 114, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16726, 1987 WL 346280
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedDecember 16, 1987
DocketNo. 85 C 8832
StatusPublished

This text of 882 F. Supp. 114 (Pohrer v. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pohrer v. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota, 882 F. Supp. 114, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16726, 1987 WL 346280 (N.D. Ill. 1987).

Opinion

MORAN, Chief Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before this Court on the Motion to Reconsider of Third-Party Defendant, Harriman Mortgage Investors, Inc., and the Motion for Reconsideration of Defendant, Title Insurance Company of Minnesota;

The Court having heretofore found and considered:

(1) This Court entered its Memorandum and Order on January 14, 1987 granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant’s liability on Count I only, and denying Plaintiffs’ Motion as to damages on Count I and denying Plaintiffs’ Motion in all other respects;
(2) The January 14, 1987 Memorandum and Order denied the Summary Judgment motions of defendant, Title Insurance Company of Minnesota and of Third-Party Defendant, Harriman Mortgage Investors, Inc.;
(3) Third-Party Defendant, Harriman Mortgage Investors, Inc., filed a Motion to Reconsider and a supporting Memorandum, and Defendant, Title Insurance Company of Minnesota, filed a Motion for Reconsideration and supporting Memorandum;
(4) The above-described Motions and Memoranda raise numerous material matters not previously considered by this Court;
(5) The Court, not yet having ruled on said pending Motions, now deems it appropriate to vacate the Memorandum and Order entered on January 14, 1987.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

This Court’s Memorandum and Order entered on January 14, 1987 is hereby vacated, and, having been vacated, has no prece-dential value. Cohen v. Illinois Institute of Technology, 524 F.2d 818, 829-30 n. 33 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 1683, 48 L.Ed.2d 187 (1976); Gilmore Steel Corporation v. United States, 585 F.Supp. 670, 674 n. 3 (C.I.T.1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilmore Steel Corp. v. United States
585 F. Supp. 670 (Court of International Trade, 1984)
Cohen v. Illinois Institute of Technology
524 F.2d 818 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Aldens, Inc. v. Kane
425 U.S. 943 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
882 F. Supp. 114, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16726, 1987 WL 346280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohrer-v-title-insurance-co-of-minnesota-ilnd-1987.