Pohlman v. Madia
This text of 134 A.D.3d 1473 (Pohlman v. Madia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion insofar as it seeks leave to reargue is granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered October 9, 2015 (132 AD3d 1370 [2015]) is amended by deleting the words “Grand Island” from the first sentence of the first paragraph of the memorandum and substituting in place thereof the words “Michigan Avenue in the City of Buffalo”; and motion insofar as it seeks in the alternative leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 A.D.3d 1473, 21 N.Y.S.3d 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohlman-v-madia-nyappdiv-2015.