Pohlig's Estate
9 Pa. D. & C. 153, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 25
Opinion
The exceptions before us relate to the refusal by the Auditing Judge of the widow’s claim for her $500 exemption. Claimant [155] and decedent were not living together for a period of fifteen years prior to decedent’s death under circumstances which the Auditing Judge found to he consentable: Olson v. Olson, 27 Pa. Superior Ct. 128. No exceptions are filed to this finding of fact. As the family relationship did not exist at the time of decedent's death, the claim was properly rejected: Arnout’s Estate, 283 Pa. 49.
The exceptions are dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pohlig's Estate, 9 Pa. D. & C. 153, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 25 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927).
9 Pa. D. & C. 153 (Pohlig's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnout's Estate
128 A. 661 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Olson v. Olson
27 Pa. Super. 128 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)