Pohl v. State
This text of 837 So. 2d 1123 (Pohl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 So. 2d 1123, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793, 2003 WL 354945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohl-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.