Pohl v. State

837 So. 2d 1123, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793, 2003 WL 354945
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 2003
DocketNo. 4D01-4823
StatusPublished

This text of 837 So. 2d 1123 (Pohl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pohl v. State, 837 So. 2d 1123, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793, 2003 WL 354945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22(1), Florida Statute (2000), and retaliation against a witness, in violation of section 914.23, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse appellant’s conviction of harassing a witness under section 914.22(2), Florida Statutes (2000), because there was no evidence that appellant’s contact with the police informant hindered, delayed, prevented, or dissuaded the informant from engaging in any of the conduct specified in section 914.22(2)(a)-(d).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 So. 2d 1123, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1793, 2003 WL 354945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohl-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.