Pohalski v. Ectheiler

City of New York Municipal Court

Pohalski v. Ectheiler

15 Misc. 695

DecidedJanuary 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Misc. 695 (Pohalski v. Ectheiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pohalski v. Ectheiler, 15 Misc. 695 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

McCarthy, J.

We have examined this case very carefully:' There seems to have been some misunderstanding as to whether or not the plaintiff waives the introduction in evidence of the affidavit and warrant of attachment under-which the levy was made and under which the defendants; justified.

In order that justice may be done and that an application-may be made to the next General Term to correct the sainé, we think it fair and proper to direct a reargument, when the; - whole case can be presented and argued.

So ordered.

Botty, J., concurs.

Reargument ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarthy, J.

We have examined this case very carefully:' There seems to have been some misunderstanding as to whether or not the plaintiff waives the introduction in evidence of the affidavit and warrant of attachment under-which the levy was made and under which the defendants; justified.

In order that justice may be done and that an application-may be made to the next General Term to correct the sainé, we think it fair and proper to direct a reargument, when the; - whole case can be presented and argued.

So ordered.

Botty, J., concurs.

Reargument ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Misc. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pohalski-v-ectheiler-nynyccityct-1896.