Pogue v. State

66 S.E.2d 647, 84 Ga. App. 595, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 732
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 7, 1951
Docket33622
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 S.E.2d 647 (Pogue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pogue v. State, 66 S.E.2d 647, 84 Ga. App. 595, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 732 (Ga. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

MacIntyre, P. J.

Where, under an accusation drawn in the language of Code § 58-608, a defendant is found guilty of being drunk on a public highway, and the only evidence introduced in the case was that the defendant was found sitting slumped over in the front seat of an automobile parked on the side of a road; that the automobile was also occupied by three other persons who had been drinking heavily, but the defendant was in a drunken stupor and was the drunkest of them all; that “the defendant was not boisterous or riotous . . he did not use vulgar, profane or obscene language . . he was not doing anything indecent and was not riotous, but was just drunk . . that he [the arresting officer] could merely see the top of the defendant’s head in the car from the road and that if anyone passed along the road, only that part of the defendant would have been visible to them . . [and] the defendant did not have his clothes unbuttoned and that all of his body or person was inside of the enclosed car and that neither his legs, head, nor feet was hanging out the sides or window of the car,” the conviction of the accused is unauthorized, and the refusal to grant a new trial is error for the reason that, while the evidence authorized a finding that the defendant was drunk on a public highway, yet it failed to show that the drunkenness was made manifest by “boisterousness, indecent condition or acting, or by vulgar, profane, or unbecoming language, or loud and violent discourse,” as charged in the accusation. [596]*596Code, § 58-608; Ramey v. State, 40 Ga. App. 658 (151 S. E. 55); Massey v. State, 56 Ga. App. 368, 370 (192 S. E. 66), and citations.

Decided September 7, 1951. Bobby Lee Cook, for plaintiff in error.

Judgment reversed.

Gardner and Townsend, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finch v. State
112 S.E.2d 824 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.E.2d 647, 84 Ga. App. 595, 1951 Ga. App. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pogue-v-state-gactapp-1951.