Pogue v. State

22 So. 3d 131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2009 WL 3784598
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 2009
Docket5D09-3536
StatusPublished

This text of 22 So. 3d 131 (Pogue v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pogue v. State, 22 So. 3d 131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2009 WL 3784598 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s determination that Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion was insufficient, but reverse and remand so that Appellant may be permitted to amend his petition if he can. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 So. 3d 131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2009 WL 3784598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pogue-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.