Pogue v. State
22 So. 3d 131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2009 WL 3784598
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s determination that Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion was insufficient, but reverse and remand so that Appellant may be permitted to amend his petition if he can. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pogue v. State, 22 So. 3d 131, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16851, 2009 WL 3784598 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
22 So. 3d 131 (Pogue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)