Poey v. State

562 So. 2d 449, 1990 WL 88098
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1990·No. 89-2774·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

562 So.2d 449 (1990)

Raymundo POEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 89-2774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 26, 1990.

*450 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Stephen L. Kramer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Raymundo Poey appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence. For the following reasons, we reverse.

When defendant was informed of his Miranda rights, handcuffed, and placed inside the patrol car, he was arrested. See State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Because the record is devoid of any evidence that the officers had probable cause to arrest defendant, we reverse the order denying the motion to suppress the physical evidence seized following his arrest.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poey v. State, 562 So. 2d 449, 1990 WL 88098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 449 (Poey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Socarras
272 So. 3d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Studemire v. State
955 So. 2d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cocke v. State
889 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAF. AND MOTOR VEHICLES v. Whitley
846 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)