Poey v. State
This text of 562 So. 2d 449 (Poey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymundo POEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
*450 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Stephen L. Kramer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Raymundo Poey appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence. For the following reasons, we reverse.
When defendant was informed of his Miranda rights, handcuffed, and placed inside the patrol car, he was arrested. See State v. Coron, 411 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Because the record is devoid of any evidence that the officers had probable cause to arrest defendant, we reverse the order denying the motion to suppress the physical evidence seized following his arrest.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 So. 2d 449, 1990 WL 88098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poey-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.