Poett v. City of Kirkwood

214 S.W.3d 408, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 285, 2007 WL 509687
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 20, 2007·No. No. ED 88185·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Poett (“Poett”) appeals from a denial of his petition to have a May 7, 2001, arrest for stalking expunged from his record. In his sole point on appeal, Poett claims that the trial court erred in failing to grant his petition to expunge the arrest because he met all the requirements of section 610.122.1

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poett v. City of Kirkwood, 214 S.W.3d 408, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 285, 2007 WL 509687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

214 S.W.3d 408 (Poett v. City of Kirkwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.