Poeschel v. Gee

248 A.D. 762

This text of 248 A.D. 762 (Poeschel v. Gee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poeschel v. Gee, 248 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants from a judgment entered upon a verdict [763]*763In favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying their motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between her husband’s automobile delivery wagon, in which she was riding, and an automobile express truck of the defendants. Upon defendants’ motion a verdict in favor of the plaintiff’s husband was set aside and his complaint dismissed. Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion the verdict was not arrived at by a fair consideration of the inferences which may be reasonably drawn from the evidence. In other words, the finding in favor of the plaintiff is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poeschel-v-gee-nyappdiv-1936.