Poer v. Terrell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Poer v. Terrell

168 N.E. 194, 90 Ind. App. 713, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 360

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 1929·No. No. 13,478.·Published

Opinion

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee for an accounting, and for the dissolution of a partnership alleged to exist by virtue of a parol agreement between appellee and appellant.

There was judgment for appellee in the sum of $314.08. The error assigned is the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, under which is presented the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court.

The evidence is conflicting, but there is ample evidence to sustain the decision. This court does not weigh the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee for an accounting, and for the dissolution of a partnership alleged to exist by virtue of a parol agreement between appellee and appellant.

There was judgment for appellee in the sum of $314.08. The error assigned is the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, under which is presented the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision of the court.

The evidence is conflicting, but there is ample evidence to sustain the decision. This court does not weigh the evidence.

Affirmed.

Poer v. Terrell, 168 N.E. 194, 90 Ind. App. 713, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 360 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

168 N.E. 194 (Poer v. Terrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.