Poepke v. Downtown Standard

356 N.W.2d 812
CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 30, 1984
DocketC6-84-979
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 356 N.W.2d 812 (Poepke v. Downtown Standard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poepke v. Downtown Standard, 356 N.W.2d 812 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

356 N.W.2d 812 (1984)

Michael W. POEPKE, Relator,
v.
DOWNTOWN STANDARD, Respondent,
Commissioner of Economic Security, Respondent.

No. C6-84-979.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 30, 1984.

Michael J. Persellin, St. Cloud, for relator.

*813 Dennis E. Dalen, Minneapolis, for Downtown Standard.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, State Atty. Gen., Regina M. Chu, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Com'r of Economic Sec.

Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and HUSPENI and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.

SUMMARY OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

FACTS

Michael Poepke was discharged when he refused to work one of his two regularly scheduled Saturdays of the month. The Commissioner affirmed the referee's decision that Poepke was disqualified from benefits because he terminated his employment voluntarily and without good cause attributable to his employer or, alternatively, that he was discharged for misconduct.

The Commissioner found that failure to come to work on Saturday knowing that a discharge would result convincingly shows that claimant lacked any concern for his job and was misconduct as defined in Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co., 295 Minn. 372, 204 N.W.2d 644 (1973).

DECISION

Under the narrow scope of review available to this court, White v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 332 N.W.2d 25, 26 (Minn. 1983), the Commissioner's decision is supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. Star Tribune
445 N.W.2d 864 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1989)
Deike v. Smelting
413 N.W.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
Christenson v. City of Albert Lea
409 N.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
Herreid v. Moore Data Management Services
392 N.W.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 N.W.2d 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poepke-v-downtown-standard-minnctapp-1984.