Poekel v. Dowling

132 So. 836, 101 Fla. 1171
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 132 So. 836 (Poekel v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poekel v. Dowling, 132 So. 836, 101 Fla. 1171 (Fla. 1931).

Opinions

Whitfield, P.J.

As authorized by Chapter 14572, Acts of 1929, T. S. Poekel brought suit “to foreclose the lien of” a tax deed which had been issued by the State under the statutes for nonpayment of State and county taxes upon lands. Parties claiming ownership of or contract liens upon the property were made defendants, as was also the city of Green Cove Springs, a municipality which *1173 claims liens for taxes and special assessments, all of which claims are alleged to be inferior to complainant’s tax deed. The bill of complaint was dismissed. Complainant appealed.

The constitutionality of Chapter. 14572 was sustained in Ridgeway v. Reese, 100 Fla. ...., 131 So. 136; Ridgeway v. Peacock, 100 Fla., ...., 131 So. 140.

A tax deed is subject to timely and appropriate adjudication of the validity of the tax proceedings upon which the tax deed is predicated. Chapter 14572 authorizes the holder of a tax deed to invoke foreclosure proceedings to test the rights of those who claim an interest in the land adversely to the tax deed holder. In such procedure those who claim against the tax deed may adduce the matters authorized by the law to be determined in the proceedings.

The 'statute and the tax deed each contains a provision that the land conveyed by the tax deed “shall continue subject and liable for any unpaid taxes thereon.” The purchaser at the foreclosure sale takes no better title than the holder of the tax deed had; the land “continues subject and liable for any unpaid taxes thereon” until they are paid or otherwise discharged. The amounts of such “unpaid Taxes may be authoritatively determined in the foreclosure proceedings when proper parties are made in the suit.

Reversed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., and Hutchison, Circuit Judge, concur. Davis, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baldwin Drainage Dist. v. Brown
165 F.2d 260 (Fifth Circuit, 1948)
Poekel v. Dowling
146 So. 662 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
First Trust & Savings Bank v. West Lake Investment Co.
141 So. 894 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Lee v. Walter-Keogh, Inc.
141 So. 131 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Tax Securities Corp. v. Borland
137 So. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 836, 101 Fla. 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poekel-v-dowling-fla-1931.