Poe v. Trumbull County

694 N.E.2d 1324, 82 Ohio St. 3d 192
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 24, 1998·No. No. 97-2127·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to us:

“Where the plaintiff demonstrates that a prior conviction was expunged by the Common Pleas Court that had entered the conviction, and following notice of the expungement to the office of the county prosecuting attorney the fact of the prior conviction is revealed to the plaintiffs employer by an employee of the county prosecuting attorney’s office in the same county in which the expungement had been ordered, does this plaintiff have standing to sue and obtain judgment for [193] compensatory damages against the county under O.R.C. [Sections] 2953.32 and 2953.35?”

The certified question is answered in the negative.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poe v. Trumbull County, 694 N.E.2d 1324, 82 Ohio St. 3d 192 (Ohio 1998).

694 N.E.2d 1324 (Poe v. Trumbull County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. Bressler
18 F. App'x 360 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)
Poe v. Trumbull Cty.
1998 Ohio 246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)