Poe v. State
139 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 668
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. The evidence for the state tended to prove the charge as laid. That for the defendant was but a denial. The question was for the jury. There is no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poe v. State, 139 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 668 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
139 So. 921 (Poe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.