Poe v. State
139 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 668
This text of 139 So. 921 (Poe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Poe v. State, 139 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 668 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law. The evidence for the state tended to prove the charge as laid. That for the defendant was but a denial. The question was for the jury. There is no prejudicial error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 So. 921, 25 Ala. App. 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poe-v-state-alactapp-1932.