Poe v. Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-8030
RICHARD KEITH POE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; JOSEPH L. ANDERSON, Warden; SANDRA BARRETT; CHARLOTTE GRECO; SAM STRICKLAND; LISA PARNELL, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MEDICAL STAFF; CORRECTIONAL STAFF,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-01568-CMC)
Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Keith Poe, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Richard Keith Poe appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Poe’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Poe v. Ozmint, No. 0:05-cv-01568-CMC
(D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poe v. Ozmint (Poe v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.