Poe v. Ozmint

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2007·No. 06-8030·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-8030

RICHARD KEITH POE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JON OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; JOSEPH L. ANDERSON, Warden; SANDRA BARRETT; CHARLOTTE GRECO; SAM STRICKLAND; LISA PARNELL, Nurse,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

MEDICAL STAFF; CORRECTIONAL STAFF,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (0:05-cv-01568-CMC)

Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Keith Poe, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., John Eric Kaufmann, MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Richard Keith Poe appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Poe’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Poe v. Ozmint, No. 0:05-cv-01568-CMC

(D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poe v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2007).

Poe v. Ozmint (Poe v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related