Poe v. Mounger

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Poe v. Mounger

19 F. Cas. 905, 1 Cranch 145

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THE COURT

was of opinion, that the bail-pieces were not absolute, but open to objection as to the insufficiency of the bail, and that when objected to they were not to be received without the bail’s justifying. But THE COURT made an order that any affidavits made by the bail before a justice of the peace of Washington county, should be deemed as if taken in court. The bail-pieces not being received, the marshal was called and produced the defendant, who was committed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

was of opinion, that the bail-pieces were not absolute, but open to objection as to the insufficiency of the bail, and that when objected to they were not to be received without the bail’s justifying. But THE COURT made an order that any affidavits made by the bail before a justice of the peace of Washington county, should be deemed as if taken in court. The bail-pieces not being received, the marshal was called and produced the defendant, who was committed.

Poe v. Mounger, 19 F. Cas. 905, 1 Cranch 145 (circtddc 1803).

Pincite

19 F. Cas. 905 (Poe v. Mounger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related