Poe v. Labrador

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

PAM POE, by and through her parents and next friends, Penny and Peter Poe; Case No. 1:23-cv-00269-BLW PENNY POE; PETER POE; JANE DOE, by and through her parents and STAY ORDER next friends, Joan and John Doe; JOAN DOE, and JOHN DOE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RAÚL LABRADOR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho et al.

Defendants.

District courts have “broad discretion to stay proceedings as incident to its power to control its own docket.” Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). In this case, the parties do not oppose staying proceedings in this case pending the resolution of the Attorney General’s pending appeal of this Court’s preliminary injunction. Accordingly, to conserve the parties’ and the judicial resources, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. This matter is STAYED pending the Ninth Circuit’s resolution of the Attorney General’s pending appeal, provided, however, that this Court’s December 26, 2023 preliminary injunction shall remain in effect during the stay. 2. The status conference scheduled for February 1, 2024 is VACATED.

_ DATED: January 31, 2024

ri yy B. Lynn Winmill Rit on! United States District Judge

ORDER - 2