Poe v. Durham Public Service Co.
135 S.E. 321, 192 N.C. 819, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 433
Opinion
Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, with respect to tbe assignments of error upon tbis appeal, Brogden, J., having been of counsel for defendants, in tbis action, not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court of Durham County is affirmed, and stands as tbe decision in tbis case without becoming a precedent. McCarter v. R. R., 187 N. C., 863.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poe v. Durham Public Service Co., 135 S.E. 321, 192 N.C. 819, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 433 (N.C. 1926).
135 S.E. 321 (Poe v. Durham Public Service Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
334 So. 2d 597 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
State v. . Golden
145 S.E. 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)