Poe v. Durham Public Service Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Poe v. Durham Public Service Co.

135 S.E. 321, 192 N.C. 819, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 433

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 10, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 135 S.E. 321 (Poe v. Durham Public Service Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poe v. Durham Public Service Co., 135 S.E. 321, 192 N.C. 819, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 433 (N.C. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

*820 Pee Cueiam.

Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, with respect to tbe assignments of error upon tbis appeal, Brogden, J., having been of counsel for defendants, in tbis action, not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court of Durham County is affirmed, and stands as tbe decision in tbis case without becoming a precedent. McCarter v. R. R., 187 N. C., 863.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*820 Pee Cueiam.

Tbe Court being evenly divided in opinion, with respect to tbe assignments of error upon tbis appeal, Brogden, J., having been of counsel for defendants, in tbis action, not sitting, tbe judgment of tbe Superior Court of Durham County is affirmed, and stands as tbe decision in tbis case without becoming a precedent. McCarter v. R. R., 187 N. C., 863.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 321, 192 N.C. 819, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poe-v-durham-public-service-co-nc-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack