Poe v. . Bright

90 S.E. 4, 172 N.C. 838, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 414
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 4, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 4 (Poe v. . Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poe v. . Bright, 90 S.E. 4, 172 N.C. 838, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 414 (N.C. 1916).

Opinion

Pek Curiam:.

This action is brought to recover possession of a certain piece of land conveyed by mortgage from the plaintiff to the defendant. There was a foreclosure of the mortgage and the property was purchased by one Johnson, the only bidder, for $200. The plaintiff alleges that at the time of the sale the mortgage-had been fully satisfied; that Johnson purchased for Bright, the mortgagee, who furnished a part of the money; that Johnson a few months after the sale reconveyed the property to Bright, the defendant. The jury have established these facts in their answer to the issues. We have examined the three assignments of error relating to the admission of evidence, and find them to- be without merit.

The motion to nonsuit was properly denied, as there is abundant evidence tending to prove that the mortgage was satisfied, and paid at *839 the time of the sale, and that Johnson purchased the land for the defendant. The exceptions to the charge are without merit. His Honor presented the case to the jury in a clear, comprehensive, and forceful charge, which we find to be free from error.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burnett v. Dunn Commission & Supply Co.
104 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 4, 172 N.C. 838, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poe-v-bright-nc-1916.