Poddar v. Clatsop County

7 P.3d 677, 168 Or. App. 556, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1117
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 28, 2000·No. 97-2092; CA A103154·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

EDMONDS, P. J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in this matter, Poddar v. Clatsop County, 167 Or App 162, 2 P3d 929 (2000), arguing that we erred in designating plaintiff as the prevailing party. We grant reconsideration and adhere to our original, opinion. Plaintiff was successful on appeal in obtaining the vacation of the supplemental judgment for attorney fees against him. However, we held that the trial court had authority to reconsider the issue of attorney fees on remand. Id. at 172. “The right to recover costs on appeal is governed by the result on appeal, not by whether the party seeking costs obtains a favorable final judgment.” Akins v. Bucyrus-Erie Co., 118 Or App 471, 473, 848 P2d 124 (1993). Thus, plaintiff is the prevailing party on appeal, regardless of the trial court’s decision on remand.

Reconsideration allowed; original opinion adhered to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poddar v. Clatsop County, 7 P.3d 677, 168 Or. App. 556, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1117 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

7 P.3d 677 (Poddar v. Clatsop County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hale v. State
314 P.3d 345 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2013)
Crandon Capital Partners Ex Rel. Willamette Industries v. Shelk
123 P.3d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)
Just v. City of Lebanon
88 P.3d 312 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
Powell v. Bunn
59 P.3d 559 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
51 P.3d 1269 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Hood River County v. Stevenson
33 P.3d 325 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Utsey v. Coos County
32 P.3d 933 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)