Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pochari v. County of Westchester

Pochari v. County of Westchester

15 A.D.2d 823, 225 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11270
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 1962
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 A.D.2d 823 (Pochari v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pochari v. County of Westchester, 15 A.D.2d 823, 225 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11270 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

In our opinion the complaint and Trumid’s cross complaint against Gamewell alleges active and passive negligence and, therefore, impleader is proper. A cross complaint or a third-party complaint is deemed sufficient on the pleadings if there is any possibility of liability over against a third party (Putvin v. Buffalo Elec. Co., 5 N Y 2d 447; Marzella v. Carlson Hoist & Mach. Co., 280 App. Div. 955; Robinson v. Binghamton Constr. Co., 277 App. Div. 468; Schoenfeld v. Four Leaf Clover Realty Corp., 273 App. Div. 824). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holloway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.
50 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 823, 225 N.Y.S.2d 229, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pochari-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-1962.