Pocatello Education v. Heidman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2009·No. 06-35004·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

POCATELLO EDUCATION  ASSOCIATION; IDAHO EDUCATION ASSOCIATION; PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF IDAHO, INC.; SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 687; AFL-CIO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

MARK HEIDEMAN, in his official No. 06-35004 capacity as Bannock County Prosecuting Attorney,  D.C. No.

CV 03-0256 BLW

Defendant, ORDER and

BEN YSURSA, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Idaho; LAWRENCE WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Idaho, Defendants-Appellants.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

Filed April 13, 2009

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., A. Wallace Tashima, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

4214 POCATELLO EDUCATION ASS’N v. HEIDEMAN ORDER

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association, 129 S. Ct. 1093, 1101 (2009), the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded with instructions to enter judgment for defendants on the local government claim.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pocatello Education v. Heidman, (9th Cir. 2009).

Pocatello Education v. Heidman (Pocatello Education v. Heidman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass'n
555 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 2009)