Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance
154 N.E. 640, 243 N.Y. 644, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 943
Opinions
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground plaintiff's alleged loss was not covered by policy.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ. *Page 645
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance, 154 N.E. 640, 243 N.Y. 644, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 943 (N.Y. 1926).
154 N.E. 640 (Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sidehill Corp. v. Glens Falls Insurance
17 Misc. 2d 647 (New York County Courts, 1959)