Poaha v. Logan

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 26, 2022·No. SCPW-22-0000522·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2022 01:19 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

KAU#I W. POAHA, Petitioner, vs.

CHIEF OF POLICE ARTHUR JOSEPH LOGAN, HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for a “peremptory”

writ of mandamus, filed on August 29, 2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ is thus not warranted. See Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996); Salling v. Moon, 76 Hawai#i 273, 274 n.3, 874 P.2d 1098, 1099 n.3 (1994). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 26, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poaha v. Logan, (haw 2022).

Poaha v. Logan (Poaha v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salling v. Moon
874 P.2d 1098 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Barnett v. Broderick
929 P.2d 1359 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)