Poaha v. Logan
This text of Poaha v. Logan (Poaha v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2022 01:19 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
KAU#I W. POAHA, Petitioner, vs. CHIEF OF POLICE ARTHUR JOSEPH LOGAN, HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition for a “peremptory” writ of mandamus, filed on August 29, 2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a lack of alternative means to seek relief. An extraordinary writ is thus not warranted. See Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929 P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996); Salling v. Moon, 76 Hawai#i 273, 274 n.3, 874 P.2d 1098, 1099 n.3 (1994). Accordingly, It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 26, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Poaha v. Logan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poaha-v-logan-haw-2022.