Poag v. Wade

9 S.C.L. 183
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1818·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gantt.

I am of opinion that the decree ought to be set aside, inasmuch as I conceive the principle of the law to be the reverse of that established by the decision of the presiding Judge. A want of consideration cannot be pleaded against the claim of an endorsee, standing in the character of the present plaintiff: that is, a bom fide holder of a negotiable paper, endorsed before due, for valuable consideration, and without any notice had of a want of consideration. I think a new trial should be had.

Grimke, Mott, Colcoch, Johnson, and Cheves, J, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poag v. Wade, 9 S.C.L. 183 (S.C. 1818).

9 S.C.L. 183 (Poag v. Wade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.