Pniewski v. Martorella
This text of Pniewski v. Martorella (Pniewski v. Martorella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2112
JOSEPH P. PNIEWSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARJORIE MARTORELLA, individually and in her official capacity as special prosecutor of Wayne County; WAYNE COUNTY COMMISSION; WEST VIRGINIA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, a state agency,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:04-cv-00354)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph P. Pniewski, Appellant Pro Se. Cheryl Lynne Connelly, CAMPBELL WOODS, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Steven Kenneth Nord, OFFUTT NORD, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joseph P. Pniewski appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pniewski v. Martorella, No. 3:04-cv-00354 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pniewski v. Martorella, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pniewski-v-martorella-ca4-2009.