Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 26, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 1982-2098
StatusPublished

This text of Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co (Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 82-2098 (PLF) ) MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER

The parties came before the Court for a status conference on March 11, 2009. On

the basis of representations made by counsel for certain parties at that time, the Court believes

that the parties to three pending motions for summary judgment have not yet fully explored the

possibility of settling some or all aspects of the issues raised by those motions. Accordingly, it is

hereby

ORDERED that, to permit the parties to engage in good faith settlement

discussions with respect to the matters at issue, the following motions are STAYED until further

order of this Court: Maryland Casualty Company’s Refiled Motion for Summary Judgment

Seeking Defense-Cost Contribution and Prejudgment Interest from Northwestern National

Insurance Company [1816]; Northwestern National Insurance Company’s Refiled Motion for

Summary Judgment Dismissing the Claims Asserted by the Pre-1974 Insurers for Defense Costs

Contribution [1832]; and Whitman Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment Seeking

Defense-Cost Contribution and Prejudgment Interest from Northwestern National Insurance Company [1853]; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that all concerned parties shall engage in good faith

settlement negotiations with respect to these three motions. The parties may, if they wish,

request a referral to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Program or to a magistrate judge

to assist in their attempts to settle these motions; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint report informing the

Court of the status of their settlement negotiations on or before May 29, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge

DATE: March 26, 2009

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pneumo-abex-corp-v-maryland-casualty-co-dcd-2009.