PNC Bank, FSB v. Sansotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

PNC Bank, FSB v. Sansotta

8 A.D.3d 460, 778 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8487

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 460 (PNC Bank, FSB v. Sansotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PNC Bank, FSB v. Sansotta, 8 A.D.3d 460, 778 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated August 12, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The record demonstrates that this action was discontinued by order dated March 23, 2001. Since the plaintiff offered no ground to vacate the order of discontinuance, the Supreme Court erred in granting its motion to restore this action to the calendar (see James v Nadal Corp., 290 AD2d 248 [2002]; Karapetyan v Underwood, 287 AD2d 547 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Townes, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated August 12, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the calendar.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

The record demonstrates that this action was discontinued by order dated March 23, 2001. Since the plaintiff offered no ground to vacate the order of discontinuance, the Supreme Court erred in granting its motion to restore this action to the calendar (see James v Nadal Corp., 290 AD2d 248 [2002]; Karapetyan v Underwood, 287 AD2d 547 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Townes, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 460, 778 N.Y.S.2d 297, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pnc-bank-fsb-v-sansotta-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack