PMO II, LP v. Setter

356 S.W.3d 809, 2012 WL 5631, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 5
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 3, 2012
DocketWD 73945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 S.W.3d 809 (PMO II, LP v. Setter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PMO II, LP v. Setter, 356 S.W.3d 809, 2012 WL 5631, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 5 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

PMO II, LP appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that concluded that Janel Setter is not disqualified for benefits because her discharge was not for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perkins v. Division of Employment Security
356 S.W.3d 809 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 S.W.3d 809, 2012 WL 5631, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pmo-ii-lp-v-setter-moctapp-2012.