PMO II, LP v. Setter

356 S.W.3d 809, 2012 WL 5631, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 5
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 3, 2012·No. WD 73945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

PMO II, LP appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that concluded that Janel Setter is not disqualified for benefits because her discharge was not for misconduct connected with work. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PMO II, LP v. Setter, 356 S.W.3d 809, 2012 WL 5631, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 5 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

356 S.W.3d 809 (PMO II, LP v. Setter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perkins v. Division of Employment Security
356 S.W.3d 809 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)